• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Qualifying Event
  • Subsidies
  • Open Enrollment

Colorado Health Insurance Insider

No-cost broker assistance.

Colorado Governor Signs Bill Requiring Maternity Coverage On All Policies

June 2, 2010 By Louise Norris

Governor Bill Ritter signed Colorado House Bill 1021 into law last week, instituting what I consider to be one of the most significant changes to health insurance law in recent years.  The law will require all health insurance policies in Colorado to provide coverage for both maternity care and contraception, starting next year.  Without this law, people who purchase individual health insurance have very little in the way of options for maternity coverage.

Of course the down side to HB1021 is cost.  It remains to be seen what will happen to premiums once all policies cover maternity.  Governor Ritter already signed a bill that will require equal pricing on policies for both genders, so the cost of providing maternity care will be spread to both men and women (seems fair enough, since both have a part in making babies).  In addition, the cost of providing care will be spread across every policyholder, much the way it works in the group market (all group plans in Colorado cover maternity, which means that everyone with a group policy is paying for maternity care whether they use it or not).

The few individual policies that have offered maternity riders over the years have had to price the riders based on the fact that the only people who are likely to add a maternity rider are people who are planning to use it.  Very few people add a maternity rider to an individual police “just in case” – mainly because of the cost of the coverage.  But if the cost of providing maternity care is spread across all policy holders, all the time, including those who won’t become pregnant or have already had their children, it makes sense to assume that the price increase for each person will be far lower than the cost of the riders that have been available on a case-by-case basis over the years.

I’m sure that there will be complaints that it isn’t fair to make everyone have a policy with maternity coverage when not everyone will use it.  But most people do eventually have children, and HB 1021 will make it possible for people without access to group health insurance to get coverage for maternity care (which, as I mentioned last month, is pretty close to impossible now).  I would love to see health insurance carriers expand maternity coverage to include access to midwives and home births, but providing access to maternity coverage for most women who buy their own health insurance is a good start.

Related Posts:

  • Options For Maternity Coverage In Colorado Disappearing Fast
    Options For Maternity Coverage In Colorado Disappearing Fast
  • Not Many Details Yet On Maternity Coverage In Colorado
    Not Many Details Yet On Maternity Coverage In Colorado
  • Maternity As An Option Rather Than A Mandate
    Maternity As An Option Rather Than A Mandate
  • Maternity Coverage On Renewing Individual Policies
    Maternity Coverage On Renewing Individual Policies
  • Colorado's Average 2012 Premium Increase Is The Smallest Since 2000
    Colorado's Average 2012 Premium Increase Is The…
  • Three Years To Iron Out Details For Health Insurance Exchange
    Three Years To Iron Out Details For Health Insurance…

Filed Under: Health Insurance Reform, Individual/Family Health, Maternity/Pregnancy

About Louise Norris

Louise Norris has been writing about health insurance and healthcare reform since 2006. In addition to the Colorado Health Insurance Insider, she also writes for healthinsurance.org, medicareresources.org, Verywell, Spark by ADP, and Boost by ADP, and Gusto. Follow on twitter and facebook.

Footer

Copyright © 2025 · Insurance Shoppers, Inc. · Privacy Policy